Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maxence Rivet vs Erik Grevelius Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rivet vs Grevelius analysis and find out who is favored!
Maxence Rivet vs Erik Grevelius Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Rivet 1 - 0 Grevelius
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rivet has won 51.54% of points on their second serve, while Grevelius has won 43.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rivet, in recent form, has won 54.98% of their opponent's second serve points, while Grevelius has won 54.55%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.65% and 39.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rivet has saved 56.15% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Grevelius has saved 43.75% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rivet has won 63.24% of matches played (W/L 43/ 25), with Grevelius winning 56.25% (W/L 9/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rivet has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 19/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 30% (W/L 6/ 14). Grevelius has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 15/ 9), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Rivet has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.15% of matches (W/L 43/ 23), where as Grevelius has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 9/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Rivet winning 1 times and Grevelius being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Rivet winning 2 and Grevelius winning 1. The last match between Rivet and Grevelius was at the M15 Hyvinkaa, 03-08-2023, First, Clay with Maxence Rivet getting the victory 6-1 4-6 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rivet and Grevelius have played a deciding set 1 times, with Rivet winning 1 times and Grevelius 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Rivet winning 0, and Grevelius 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rivet has played against opponents with an average rank of 100.69 while Grevelius has played against players with an average rank of 19.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rivet has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Grevelius has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rivet has converted 40.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Grevelius has converted 41.94% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
639
Rank
639
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
57% (69-52)
Career Total W/L
57% (16-12)
48% (12-13)
YTD W/L
67% (6-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Maxence Rivet vs Erik Grevelius For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Rivet VS Grevelius
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Maxence Rivet | Erik Grevelius |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:0 | 1:41:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (52/77) | 55% (38/69) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (33/52) | 55% (21/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 72% (18/25) | 58% (18/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (30/69) | 34% (26/77) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 4-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Maxence Rivet
Player
Erik Grevelius
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maxence Rivet | Erik Grevelius |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (12/13) | 67% (6/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (28/28) | 67% (12/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (273/272) | 60% (91/61) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (9/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 30% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 65 | 7 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 56 | 19 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:9 | 1:8:46 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 92.12 | 35.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (996/1611) | 70% (256/368) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (684/996) | 65% (167/256) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (317/615) | 44% (49/112) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (65/159) | 42% (26/62) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (672/1718) | 45% (200/441) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 52% (12/11) | 67% (6/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (12/25) | 67% (6/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 22% (2/9) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (14/12) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (14/2) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (11/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Maxence Rivet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Maxence Rivet
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
30 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
20 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxence Rivet
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxence Rivet
Player
Diogo Marques
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maxence Rivet
Player
Arthur Bouquier
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maxence Rivet
Player
Leonardo Rossi
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxence Rivet
Player
Jesse Flores
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxence Rivet
Player
Matthew Summers
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
72 of
103)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
46 of
72)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
46%
(
39 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxence Rivet
Player
Taiyo Yamanaka
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Maxence Rivet
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
3
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxence Rivet
Player
Filippo Romano
75%
(
93 of
124)
1st Serve %
60%
(
85 of
142)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
65 of
85)
74%
(
23 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
32%
(
40 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
54 of
142)
138
Total Points Won
128
|
6-4 6-7(7) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Erik Grevelius Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Erik Grevelius
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Erik Grevelius
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Erik Grevelius
Player
Sergis Kyratzis
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexandre Aubriot
Player
Erik Grevelius
43%
(
26 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Erik Grevelius
Player
Andrea Gola
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Erik Grevelius
Player
Filip Stidell
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
84)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
46 of
84)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Erik Grevelius
Player
Filip Gustafsson
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Enzo Aguiard
Player
Erik Grevelius
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
112)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
9
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
47 of
70)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
31 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
113
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(7) 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Rivet Vs Grevelius Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Rivet are available here and Grevelius photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
